Legal Opinion

Estate of Welch

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 24, 1907No. Civ. No. 323PublishedCited by 17 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtCooper, P. J.

The last will of deceased was admitted to probate, and Bridget Welch, the widow, appointed executrix thereof. The appellant, Mary Ellen Aston, the daughter of the deceased and the executrix, within the year filed a petition for the revocation of the probate of the will upon the ground of undue influence. The respondent, who is the mother of appellant, filed an answer to the petition, denying the allegations as to undue influence. The case came on for trial upon such issue before the court with a jury. After appellant had introduced her testimony and rested, respondent made a motion for a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of ArnoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Masterson v. SheltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Dolliver v. DolliverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Estate of TibbettsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Snowball v. SnowballCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Switzer v. EakleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  3. Daly v. WedemeyerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
  4. Ziegler v. HettermannCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  5. Henry v. LingsweilerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API