Legal Opinion

Ziegler v. Hettermann

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 4, 1941No. Civ. 13274PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHAW, J. pro tem.

A will of the decedent, John Hettermann, was regularly admitted to probate on petition of the respondent Olga Wunderlich Hettermann. Thereafter a contest of this will was filed by the appellant, Marie Ziegler. The other appellants were made defendants to this contest, but filed an answer in which they admitted the truth of the contesting petition and joined in the prayer for revocation of probate of the will, and, pursuant to stipulation, at the trial they were deemed and treated as contestants, and we refer to them as such. After a verdict in favor of appellants, the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Estate of LancesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  2. In re Estate of McDevittCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Peterson v. LoganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Gavin v. Protestant Episcopal BishopCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  5. In Re the Estate of ArnoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of McCauleyArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  2. In Re Thompson's EstateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
  3. Pohlmann v. NaschelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  4. Estate of MesnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  5. Morris v. BermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API