Legal Opinion

Switzer v. Eakle

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 16, 1939No. Civ. 6243PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTuttle, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment, order denying motion for new trial, and order denying a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, in an action wherein the jury found for the contestants in a proceeding based upon objections to the probate of a will.

Opposition to the probate of the will was upon several grounds, including the unsoundness of mind of the testatrix, but respondents, at the trial abandoned all grounds except that of undue influence. The verdict of the jury was a finding to the effect that the execution of the will was procured by undue influence upon the part of William…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. In re Estate of McDevittCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. In Re the Estate of ArnoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Snowball v. SnowballCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Estate of BairdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Bacon v. SouleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Jamison v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Matter of Estate of BealSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  3. Estate of HamptonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  4. Estate of GeloneseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  5. MacKechnie v. OliverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API