Legal Opinion

St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company, a Corporation v. Sears, Roebuck and Company, a Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 4, 1979No. 77-3515PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARNES, Senior Circuit Judge.

St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company (“St. Paul”) brought this diversity action against Sears, Roebuck and Co. (“Sears”) and others 1 for declaratory relief as to its obligation to Sears, CCC Plastics, Inc. (“CCC Plastics”) and other parties under a policy of liability insurance issued to the latter two named corporations. Summary judgment was granted in St. Paul’s favor and Sears now appeals to this Court. I. FACTS

St. Paul entered into a “Comprehensive General and Automobile Liability Coverage” insurance agreement (“Insuring Agreement”) with CCC Plastics…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Hauenstein v. St. Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  3. Geddes & Smith, Inc. v. Saint Paul Mercuy Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Hamilton Die Cast, Inc. v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
  5. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. CossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. First Ins. Co. of Hawaii v. StateHawaii Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Hirst v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceIdaho Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Victor Maneikis v. St. Paul Insurance Company of IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
  4. Todd Shipyards Corp. v. Turbine Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  5. Fisher v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1998

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API