Legal Opinion

State v. Poole

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 17, 1975No. 62PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUSKINS, Justice.

Defendant’s first assignment of error is based on the admission of Mrs. McGill’s testimony that defendant committed the crime of rape in addition to the crime of kidnapping.

It is a general rule of evidence that in a prosecution for a particular crime the State cannot offer evidence tending to show that the accused has committed another distinct, independent, or separate offense. State v. Long, 280 N.C. 638, 187 S.E. 2d 47 (1972). But it is equally well established that this rule does not apply when the two crimes are parts of the same transaction and are so connected in time…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. State v. McClainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  3. State v. CaddellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  4. State v. GoldbergSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  5. State v. MacKSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. BarfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  2. State v. BrowerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  3. State v. SatterfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  4. State v. HopkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  5. State v. WootenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API