State v. Wooten
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
EAGLES, Judge.
I
Defendant first contends that the trial court erred in allowing the prosecution to inquire about the seven plastic bags containing cocaine residue and the $1,109.25 found in the defendant’s possession when he was arrested. This contention is without merit.
At trial the defendant testified in his own behalf. During cross-examination by the district attorney the defendant testified as follows:
Q: Mr. Wooten, have you ever sold any cocaine, sir?
A: Have I ever sold any?
Q: Yes.
A: No. I haven’t.
Q: Do you ever use any cocaine?
A: I don’t even drink no liquor no more.
Q: Ever possessed any…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. PenleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- State v. GallowaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. . SimsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- State v. HerbinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995