Legal Opinion

State v. Hopkins

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 16, 1979No. 58PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COPELAND, Justice.

For the reasons stated below, we find no error in defendants’ trial.

In their first assignment of error, defendants claim the trial court erred in allowing the State to use leading questions during the direct examination of Howard Miller, the main prosecuting witness.

The general rule in North Carolina is that a party cannot use leading questions during direct examination of his own witness. See, e.g., State v. Greene, 285 N.C. 482, 206 S.E. 2d 229 (1974). This rule is subject to various exceptions, one of which is if the witness “has difficulty in understanding the question…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Preston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. State v. GreeneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  4. State v. YoungSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  5. State v. SilerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. PinchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. State v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  3. State v. McHoneCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  4. State v. SquireSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  5. State v. PinchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API