Legal Opinion

Tolzman v. Tolzman

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 16, 1915No. Nos. 19,315—(193)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Action for a limited divorce in the district court for Waseca county. The case was tried before Childress, J., who when plaintiff rested denied defendant’s motion to dismiss the action, and made findings and ordered judgment for an absolute divorce in favor of defendant. From an order denying her motion for a new trial, plaintiff appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtBunn, J.

Plaintiff and defendant were married in July, 1912. This action was commenced by plaintiff, in December of the same year for a limited divorce under R. L. 1905, § 3598,2 the complaint alleging desertion and refusal to provide support, and asking judgment for a separation from bed and board, and for “suitable and proper alimony.” Defendant answered denying the allegations of desertion *343and failure to support, alleging that plaintiff without cause deserted defendant, and asking the dismissal of the action. The complaint asked for temporary alimony and suit money, and in January, 1913, an order…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kusel v. KuselCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Hurning v. HurningSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
  3. Wagner v. WagnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Heinemann v. HeinemannWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Bark v. BarkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  3. Hoogesteger v. WardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API