Legal Opinion

Hoogesteger v. Ward

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 1, 1932No. 28,917PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.

Defendant appealed from a judgment granting her husband a divorce.

The divorce was granted upon two grounds, viz. desertion and cruel treatment. The summons and complaint Avere personally served upon the defendant on January 10, 1931, but she did not appear in the action until after the husband’s death, which was a few days after the entry of judgment.

The claim uoav is that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action and hence the court did not acquire jurisdiction; and further that the evidence fails to prove the cause of action for desertion or the cause of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hurning v. HurningSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
  2. Wagner v. WagnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
  3. Tolzman v. TolzmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bark v. BarkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API