Heinemann v. Heinemann
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWickhem, J.
Plaintiff appeals upon two grounds: (1) That the statutory requirements with reference to service of the counterclaim upon the district attorney, and with reference to his appearance in open court, were not satisfied, *641and that the judgment is void for want of jurisdiction; and (2) that the period of desertion, as shown by the evidence, was for less than the period required by statute.
Sec. 247.14, Stats., provides:
“In any action to affirm or annul a marriage, or for a divorce, the plaintiff and defendant shall, within ten days after making service on the opposite party of his complaint,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Smith v. SmithNew York Court of Chancery · 1834
- Hiecke v. HieckeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1916
- Martin v. MartinWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1890
- Hurning v. HurningSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
- White v. WhiteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1918
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cameron v. CameronSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Beyer v. SeymerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1946
- Limberg v. LimbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
- Brevak v. BrevakCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1979
- Liber v. LiberConnecticut Superior Court · 1937