Legal Opinion

Barcelon v. Cortese

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 26, 1968No. Civ. 24267PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.

These consolidated appeals involve the actions of two licensed real estate brokers, plaintiff, Theodore M. Barcelon, and E. S. Merriman & Sons, a corporation, to recover commissions on alleged agreements for their respective services to the buyer, defendant, Boss W. Córtese, president and agent of defendant, Bossmoor Corporation.

Barcelon and Merriman stipulated that each would be entitled to 50 percent of any judgment recovered by the other and the actions were consolidated for trial. Barcelon appeals from the judgment of nonsuit against him and in favor of Córtese and Bossmoor, contending…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Beazell v. SchraderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Moore v. BorgfeldtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  3. Franklin v. HansenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Brautigam v. BrooksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  5. Hooper v. MayfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hunt v. SmythCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  2. Seck v. FoulksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  3. Westside Estate Agency, Inc. v. RandallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  4. Osborne v. Huntington Beach Union High School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API