Legal Opinion

Hooper v. Mayfield

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 19, 1952No. Civ. 15122PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.

This is an action by a broker to recover a commission on a sale of real estate. A general demurrer to his complaint was sustained without leave to amend and he appeals from the judgment entered accordingly. It is conceded that no further cause of action can be stated by amendment. The complaint contains in evidentiary detail all the facts on which plaintiff bases his right to commission, the correspondence between the parties being set out in haec verba. The substance of appellant’s allegations is as follows:

Plaintiff is a licensed real estate broker doing business as such. In August of 1949…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Marks v. Walter G. McCarty Corp.California Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Toomy v. DunphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Moore v. BorgfeldtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  4. Shaffer v. BeinhornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Rhode v. BartholomewCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Batson v. StrehlowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Freeman v. JerginsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  3. Franklin v. HansenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Rader Co. v. StoneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  5. Palmer v. WahlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API