Legal Opinion

Stroud Municipal Hospital v. Mooney

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 11, 1996No. 85947PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SUMMERS, Justice:

The only issue in this Workers’ Compensation review is whether the lower court’s decision that the Claimant’s injury arose out of and in the course of his employment is supported by competent evidence. Applying the statutory and case law to the facts before us, we conclude that it is.

Claimant Mooney worked for the Stroud Hospital as a laboratory supervisor. On the date in question he went home for lunch, and had been there fifteen minutes when the Hospital called. He was told to return for an emergency; a man in the Emergency Room was believed to have suffered a heart attack…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Parks v. Norman Municipal HospitalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
  2. American Management Systems, Inc. v. BurnsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  3. Novak v. McAlisterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
  4. Fudge v. University of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
  5. Christian v. Nicor Drilling Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. McLin v. Industrial Specialty ContractorsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2003
  2. Lanman v. Oklahoma County Sheriff's OfficeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
  3. Turner v. B Sew InnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
  4. Odyssey/Americare of Oklahoma v. WordenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
  5. Barnhill v. Smithway Motor ExpressSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API