Legal Opinion
Cudahy Packing Co. of Nebraska v. Industrial Commission
Utah Supreme Court
Decided April 24, 1922No. 3778PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGideon, J.
The plaintiff, Cudahy Packing Company, by writ of review seeks the annulment of an award made by the Industrial Commission in favor of the dependents of Joseph Parra-more, deceased. The dependents and' the Industrial Commission are made defendants.
There is no dispute about the dependency of the claimants, nor of the fact of employment or wages deceased received.
The plaintiff owns and operates a packing plant in what is known as’ North Salt Lake, in Davis county, about six miles north' from Salt Lake City. More than 40 per cent, of its employes reside in Salt Lake City. Other employes reside…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- McNicol's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Int. Com. Comm. v. Louis. & Nash. RRSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Sundine's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- Claim of Kowalek v. New York Consolidated RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Cudahy Packing Co. Of Nebraska v. ParramoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Hunter v. SummervilleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
- STATE TAX COM'N v. Industrial Com'n of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1984
- Jaynes v. Potlatch Forests, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1954
- M & K Corp. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1948
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.