Legal Opinion

Fudge v. University of Oklahoma

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 7, 1983No. 58089PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPALA, Justice:

The issue presented on certiorari is whether a worker’s injury arose out of and in the course of employment. We answer in the affirmative and hold that when an employee must of necessity cross a public street in order to reach his car in the employer-provided parking lot, traffic on that street constitutes an employer-created hazard and injury suffered while crossing it in going to or coming from lunch is deemed to arise out of and in the course of employment.

Gloria Fudge [Claimant] was employed as a secretary by the University of Oklahoma at its physical plant located on the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Thomas v. Keith Hensel Optical LabsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  2. R. J. Allison, Inc. v. BolingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  3. Novak v. McAlisterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
  4. Greenwood v. Lyles & Buckner, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
  5. Ramer v. State Ex Rel. WardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Willard v. KelleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
  2. Corbett v. Express PersonnelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
  3. Lanman v. Oklahoma County Sheriff's OfficeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
  4. Stroud Municipal Hospital v. MooneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
  5. Turner v. B Sew InnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API