Legal Opinion
McDonald v. Prowdley
District Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided August 17, 1965No. Civ. A. No. 4819PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOX, District Judge.
This is a motion on behalf of the plaintiffs for production pursuant to Rule 34, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, to give plaintiffs access to statements taken from certain witnesses who were occupants of a motor vehicle involved in an accident which is the subject matter of this suit, and to permit plaintiffs to inspect and duplicate photographs taken shortly after the time of the. accident.
The facts of this case insofar as they pertain to this motion show that on October 20, 1963, plaintiffs Patricia and Christina McDonald, minors, were passengers in a car driven by…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Richard Hauger v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1954
- Frederick Z. Goosman, to His Own Use and to the Use of Royal Indemnity Company, a Body Corporate v. A. Duie Pyle, Inc., a Body CorporateCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1963
- Communist Party of the United States of America v. Subversive Activities Control BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
- Michel v. MeierDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1948
- McNelley v. PerryDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1955
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Southern Railway Company v. Carl Talmadge LanhamCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. JohnsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
- Dvorak v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1975
- Smith v. Maryland Casualty Co.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1967
- Campbell v. Beem, Circuit Court of the 13th Judicial Circuit of Florida, Hillsborough County1967
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.