Legal Opinion
Communist Party of the United States of America v. Subversive Activities Control Board
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided April 11, 1958No. 11850PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PRETTYMAN, Circuit Judge.
This is the second time this ease has been here. After our decision upon the first petition 1 the Supreme Court ordered the case remanded to the Subversive Activities Control Board for reconsideration under Section 14(a) of the Subversive Activities Control Act 2 in the light of allegations that the testimony of three witnesses, Crouch, Johnson and Matusow, who had testified for the Government at the original hearing, was perjured. 3 The Board struck the testimony of those witnesses and issued a Modified Report and an order based thereon. The Party petitions for…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Jencks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Federal Communications Commission v. Pottsville Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Communist Party of the United States of America v. Subversive Activities Control BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1955
- Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1938
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Communist Party of United States v. Subversive Activities Control Bd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Landry v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000
- Robert P. Smith v. James R. Schlesinger, Secretary of DefenseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
- Richard G. Augenblick v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
- National Labor Relations Board v. Adhesive Products CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.