Legal Opinion

Frederick Z. Goosman, to His Own Use and to the Use of Royal Indemnity Company, a Body Corporate v. A. Duie Pyle, Inc., a Body Corporate

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided June 29, 1963No. 8762PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOREMAN, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff-appellant, Frederick Z. Goos-man, sustained personal injuries and property damage when his automobile collided with the rear of a 46-foot tractor-trailer rig leased by defendant-ap-pellee, A. Duie Pyle, Inc. (Pyle or defendant herein), and operated by its agent, Anderson, as the rear of the trailer extended across the median strip and into the eastbound portion of four-lane U.S. Route 40. The accident occurred at a concrete crossover extending between eastbound and westbound portions of U.S. Route 40, about 950 feet east of the intersection of Route 40 and…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. United States v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  3. Connors v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  4. Bryant v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  5. Casey v. Roman Catholic ArchbishopCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1958

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. In Re Grand Jury Investigation. Appeal of United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
  2. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa. v. Murray Sheet Metal Company, Incorporated, and Arkwright Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
  3. Southern Railway Company v. Carl Talmadge LanhamCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  4. Burlington Industries v. Exxon Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1974
  5. Thomas Organ Co. v. Jadranska Slobodna PlovidbaDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1972

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API