Legal Opinion

Paul Nelson Farm v. South Dakota Department of Revenue

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 21, 2014No. 26795, 26805PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GILBERTSON, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1.] The Department of Revenue and Regulation conducted an audit on Paul Nelson Farm and assessed use tax and interest against Paul Nelson Farm for its purchases of food, beverages, and ammunition. Paul Nelson Farm contested the assessment of use tax and appealed to the circuit court. The circuit court held Paul Nelson Farm was not liable for use tax on food, but was liable for use tax on beverages and ammunition. The Department appeals the decision of the circuit court, arguing Paul Nelson Farm owes tax on all three categories of goods. Paul Nelson Farm responds…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Behrens v. WedmoreSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Sioux Falls Newspapers, Inc. v. Secretary of RevenueSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State, Division of Human Rights Ex Rel. Ewing v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Robinson & Muenster Associates, Inc. v. South Dakota Department of RevenueSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  5. In Re the State Sales & Use Tax Liability of Pam Oil, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1990

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Citibank, N.A. v. South Dakota Department of RevenueSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Black Hills Truck & Trailer, Inc. v. South Dakota Department of RevenueSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Matter of Carver Revocable TrustSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Matter of the Petition of Luff Exploration Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  5. U.S. Bank National Assoc. v. S.D. Dept of RevenueSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API