Legal Opinion

Matter of the Petition of Luff Exploration Co.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 6, 2015No. 27147PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZINTER, Justice.

[¶'1.] Linda Golden owned a mineral interest that was within a “spacing unit” 1 in which Luff Exploration Company desired to drill for oil. Because Golden rejected Luffs offer to lease her mineral interest or participate in the cost of drilling, Luff petitioned the South Dakota Board of Minerals and Environment (Board) to “compulsory pool” 2 the mineral interests in the spacing unit. Luff also sought “risk compensation” 3 from Golden. Over Golden’s objection, the Board granted Luffs petition for compulsory pooling and risk compensation, and the circuit court affirmed. On…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State, Division of Human Rights Ex Rel. Ewing v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Application of KohlmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Trumm v. CleaverSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  4. In Re YanniSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Paul Nelson Farm v. South Dakota Department of RevenueSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Matter of the Adoption of A.A.B. & B.A.B.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Amended May 15, 2017 Dutrac Community Credit Union and Kwik Trip, Inc. v. Radiology Group Real Estate, L.C. Shamrock Properties, L.C. Duffy Family Limited Partnership Bigger Better Betty Building, L.L.C. and Quad City OMS, L.C.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API