Legal Opinion

Robinson & Muenster Associates, Inc. v. South Dakota Department of Revenue

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 6, 1999No. NonePublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMUNDSON, Justice.

[¶ 1.] South Dakota Department of Revenue (Department) appeals from the circuit court’s determination that transactions between Robinson & Muenster Associates, Inc., (Robinson) and its suppliers were not taxable under South Dakota’s Use Tax. We affirm.

FACTS

[¶ 2.] Robinson is a research, fundrais-ing, and grass roots telecommunications1 business located in Sioux Falls, South Dakota. For purposes of conducting its business, Robinson purchases telematching services2 along with samples and lists of telephone numbers for demographically identified groups or areas (collectively…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re the Sales & Use Tax Refund Request of Media One, Inc., License No. 51-0180701-STSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  2. National Food Corp. v. Aurora County Board of CommissionersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Sioux Falls Newspapers, Inc. v. Secretary of RevenueSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Thermoset Plastics, Inc. v. State, Department of RevenueSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  5. State, Department of Revenue v. Sanborn Telephone CooperativeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Butler MacHinery Co. v. South Dakota Department of RevenueSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Sioux Falls Shopping News, Inc. v. Department of Revenue & RegulationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Puetz Corp. v. South Dakota Department of RevenueSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Paul Nelson Farm v. South Dakota Department of RevenueSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Hofer v. Redstone Feeders, LLCSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API