Legal Opinion

State, Division of Human Rights Ex Rel. Ewing v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1978No. 12414PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUNN, Justice.

This is an appeal from an order of the Human Rights Commission (Commission) finding that exclusion of benefits to unmarried persons for pregnancy and pregnancy-related disabilities under a group health insurance plan constituted illegal discrimination on the basis of sex. The circuit court reversed the Commission upon finding that providing a group insurance policy which does not include pregnancy in its coverage of unmarried persons does not constitute discrimination on the basis of sex. We affirm the circuit court in its reversal of the Commission.

The facts were stipulated by…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. General Electric Co. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Geduldig v. AielloSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Boe v. FossSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Clem v. City of YanktonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Piper v. Neighborhood Youth Corps.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Oahe Conservancy Subdistrict v. JanklowSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Kassab v. Michigan Basic Property InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Zander v. South Dakota State Conservation CommissionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Citibank, N.A. v. South Dakota Department of RevenueSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  5. LaBore v. MuthSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API