Legal Opinion

Sioux Falls Newspapers, Inc. v. Secretary of Revenue

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1988No. 15855PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*807SABERS, Justice.

The Department of Revenue (Department) appeals a circuit court decision which reversed an administrative determination of sales tax on retail printing charges and use tax on syndicated materials. We agree with Department’s assessment of sales tax on printing charges but disagree on use tax on syndicated materials.

Facts

Department conducted a sales and use tax audit of the Sioux Falls Argus Leader (Argus) for the years 1982,1983, and 1984. Argus was assessed additional tax and interest for sales and use during this period. The taxes were paid under protest and Argus sued to…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Grosjean v. American Press Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Permann v. South Dakota Department of Labor, Unemployment Insurance DivisionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Caldor, Inc. v. HeffernanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  4. Daily Record Co. v. JamesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
  5. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. State Tax CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. In Re the Sales & Use Tax Refund Request of Media One, Inc., License No. 51-0180701-STSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Border States Paving, Inc. v. South Dakota State Department of RevenueSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Watertown Coop. Elevator Ass'n v. South Dakota Department of RevenueSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Robinson & Muenster Associates, Inc. v. South Dakota Department of RevenueSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State Ex Rel. Clayburgh v. American West Community Promotions, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2002

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API