Legal Opinion

Peter v. Johnson

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided March 26, 1997No. Civil 4-96-642(DSD/JMM)PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

DOTY, District Judge.

This matter is before the court on plaintiffs’ motion for preliminary injunction, plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment, and defendants’ motions- to dismiss. Based on a review of the file, record and proceedings herein, and for the reasons stated, the court denies plaintiffs’ motion for preliminary injunction and motion for partial summary judgment; and grants in part, and denies in part defendants’ motions to dismiss.

BACKGROUND

Plaintiff Sarah Peter is a child with Down’s Syndrome disabilities. She resides with her mother, Joan Peter, in Buffalo, Minnesota,…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Peter v. WedlCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
  2. Little Rock School District v. MauneyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
  3. Moubry Ex Rel. Moubry v. Independent School Dist. 696District Court, D. Minnesota · 1998
  4. Emma C. v. EastinDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1997
  5. Editek, Inc. v. Morgan Capital, L.L.C.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1997

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API