Legal Opinion
Editek, Inc. v. Morgan Capital, L.L.C.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided August 4, 1997No. Civ. 97-253/RHK/JMMPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
KYLE, District Judge.
Introduction
Plaintiff Editek, Inc. (“Editek”) brings this action against Defendants Morgan Capital, L.L.C. (“Morgan Capital”), and Alex and David Bistricer (“the Bistricers”) (collectively “Defendants”), alleging violation of Section 16(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78p(b), in connection with Defendants’ sale of Editek stock. This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss the Complaint for Improper Venue, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(3), for Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief May Be Granted,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Coleman v. WattCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
- Foremost-McKeeson, Inc. v. Provident Securities Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- County of St. Charles, Missouri v. Missouri Family Health CouncilCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- Peter v. JohnsonDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- EDITEK, INC., Appellant, v. MORGAN CAPITAL, L.L.C.; Alex Bistricer; David Bistricer, AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
- Medtox Scientific, Inc. v. Morgan Capital L.L.C.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1999
- Medtox Scientific, Inc., Formerly Known as Editek, Inc. v. Morgan Capital, L.L.C., Alex Bistricer, David BistricerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
- Bistricer v. Singer, Bienenstock, Zamansky, Ogele & Selengut, LLPAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Editek, Inc. v. Morgan CapitalCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.