Legal Opinion
Little Rock School District v. Mauney
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided June 14, 1999No. 98-1721PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HEANEY, Circuit Judge.
Appellees/defendants/cross-plaintiffs, Mr. and Mrs. James Mauney, frustrated with their inability to obtain an education for their severely physically disabled son, secured a due process hearing against the Little Rock School District (LRSD) under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), 20 U.S.C. §§ 1400-1491o (1998).1 On February 3, 1997, a hearing officer found for the Mauneys and awarded compensatory education. The LRSD then initiated this action, claiming that the findings and award are not supported by the record. The Mauneys cross-claimed against…
2Cases cited58 opinions
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Gordon M. Becker v. University of Nebraska, at OmahaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- Jim C. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
- Hershel R. Stanley v. Jon E. Litscher, Secretary, Wisconsin Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Sandoval v. HaganCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
- A.W. v. Jersey City Public SchoolsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.