Glazer v. Hanson
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.
The above-named actions, though based partly upon different contracts, begun separately and asking for judgment in different sums, were consolidated for the purposes of this appeal and have been presented upon one transcript and argued in one set of briefs. For convenience we will consider first, the questions presented in the Glazer case, which to some extent will answer the questions presented in the appeal by Considine, and we will then consider the questions which are peculiar to the Considine appeal. Both cases were prosecuted to recover commissions relating to the exchange of real…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Craig v. ZelianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Dillingham v. DahlgrenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Myres v. SurryhneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- Sun-Maid Raisin Growers v. Paul A. Mosesian & Son, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1928
- Proulx v. Sacramento Valley Land Co.California Court of Appeal · 1912
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Curran v. HastreiterAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
- Dunn v. SlemonsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
- Jonas v. LelandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- O'Banion v. ParadisoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- Nowell v. Andrew Wright Enters., Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.