Sun-Maid Raisin Growers v. Paul A. Mosesian & Son, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.
Action by plaintiff to recover a certain sum alleged to be due as liquidated damages by virtue of a contract entered into between plaintiff’s assignor and the defendant. The defendant had judgment and the plaintiff appeals.
On or about the twenty-fifth day of April, 1923, the Sun-Maid Raisin Growers, a corporation, the assignor of the plaintiff herein, and the defendant entered into a written agreement pertaining to the marketing of certain crops of raisins to be produced upon the lands of the defendant. The Sun-Maid Raisin Growers, a corporation, was a corporation organized for profit, having…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Dyer Bros. I. Wks. v. Central I. Wks.California Supreme Court · 1920
- Pacific Factor Co. v. AdlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Anaheim Citrus Fruit Ass'n v. YeomanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Dyer Bros. Golden W. Iron Works v. Cent. Iron WorksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- California Bean Growers' Ass'n v. Rindge Land & Navigation Co.California Supreme Court · 1926
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Harris v. Mun. Court of L.A.California Supreme Court · 1930
- Ebbert v. Mercantile Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1931
- Kelly v. McDonaldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Cook v. King Manor and Convalescent HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Electrical Products Corp. v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1953
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.