Legal Opinion

Sun-Maid Raisin Growers v. Paul A. Mosesian & Son, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 8, 1928No. Docket No. 3431PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.

Action by plaintiff to recover a certain sum alleged to be due as liquidated damages by virtue of a contract entered into between plaintiff’s assignor and the defendant. The defendant had judgment and the plaintiff appeals.

On or about the twenty-fifth day of April, 1923, the Sun-Maid Raisin Growers, a corporation, the assignor of the plaintiff herein, and the defendant entered into a written agreement pertaining to the marketing of certain crops of raisins to be produced upon the lands of the defendant. The Sun-Maid Raisin Growers, a corporation, was a corporation organized for profit, having…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Dyer Bros. I. Wks. v. Central I. Wks.California Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Pacific Factor Co. v. AdlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Anaheim Citrus Fruit Ass'n v. YeomanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  4. Dyer Bros. Golden W. Iron Works v. Cent. Iron WorksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  5. California Bean Growers' Ass'n v. Rindge Land & Navigation Co.California Supreme Court · 1926

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Harris v. Mun. Court of L.A.California Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Ebbert v. Mercantile Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Kelly v. McDonaldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  4. Cook v. King Manor and Convalescent HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  5. Electrical Products Corp. v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1953

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API