Myres v. Surryhne
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the county of Alameda. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
The Court.
The case arises out of an action to recover a reasonable compensation for services alleged to have been rendered by the plaintiff’s assignor as a real estate agent, in bringing about an exchange of certain real properties for the defendant.
• On the trial of the issue framed by the complaint and answer, plaintiff gave in evidence a book kept by the real estate agent,, in'which he or his clerk entered memoranda of real properties for sale or exchange. The book shows a memorandum which it was proved was furnished by the defendant and transcribed on the book by the clerk of the agent.…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- McCarthy v. LoupeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
3Cited by22 opinions
- Toomy v. DunphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Shanklin v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Jamison v. HydeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Sorenson v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1913
- Kleinsorge & Heilbron v. LinessCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.