Legal Opinion

Hartmeier v. Eiseman

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 22, 1949No. 30926PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

We are here confronted with the question of whether a check on which payment was stopped had been accepted as an absolute or a conditional payment.

On December 17, 1946, the maker of the check and his wife (respondents here) signed an instrument captioned “Agreement to Purchase,” whereby they offered to purchase a farm belonging to the payee and his wife (appellants here) for ninety thousand dollars; and on that date the respondents paid one thousand dollars as earnest money. By this instrument, the respondents agreed to pay the further sum of twenty-nine thousand dollars upon the acceptance…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Blenz v. FogleWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Norman v. MeekerWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Pollak Bros. v. Niall-Herin Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1911
  4. Anderson v. National Bank of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1928
  5. National Market Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1918

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. First Union Management, Inc. v. SlackCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984
  2. Barlean v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  3. Vedder v. SpellmanWashington Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Vedder v. SpellmanWashington Supreme Court · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API