Hartmeier v. Eiseman
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.
We are here confronted with the question of whether a check on which payment was stopped had been accepted as an absolute or a conditional payment.
On December 17, 1946, the maker of the check and his wife (respondents here) signed an instrument captioned “Agreement to Purchase,” whereby they offered to purchase a farm belonging to the payee and his wife (appellants here) for ninety thousand dollars; and on that date the respondents paid one thousand dollars as earnest money. By this instrument, the respondents agreed to pay the further sum of twenty-nine thousand dollars upon the acceptance…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Blenz v. FogleWashington Supreme Court · 1923
- Norman v. MeekerWashington Supreme Court · 1916
- Pollak Bros. v. Niall-Herin Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1911
- Anderson v. National Bank of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1928
- National Market Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1918
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- First Union Management, Inc. v. SlackCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984
- Barlean v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
- Vedder v. SpellmanWashington Supreme Court · 1971
- Vedder v. SpellmanWashington Supreme Court · 1971