Legal Opinion

National Market Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1918No. 14284PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Mackintosh, J., entered May 19, 1917, upon sustaining a demurrer to the complaint, dismissing an action on a contractor’s bond.

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

The plaintiff, National Market Company, claiming to be the assignee of certain claims for labor performed upon public work of the city of Se*371attle, secured by bond executed by the defendant, Maryland Casualty Company, as surety, under Rem. Code, § 1159, seeks recovery against the defendant upon such bond. The defendant demurred to the plaintiff’s complaint upon the sole ground that it “does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.” This demurrer was sustained by the superior court, and the plaintiff electing not to plead further, judgment of dismissal with prejudice was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Northwestern National Bank v. Guardian Casualty & Guaranty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Gilmore v. WestermanWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Small v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. J.W.D., Inc. v. Federal Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1991
  2. Dysart Corp. v. Seaboard Surety Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  3. Anderson v. National Bank of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1928
  4. International Commercial Collectors, Inc. v. Mazel Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1987
  5. Finch v. EnkeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API