Pollak Bros. v. Niall-Herin Co.
Supreme Court of Georgia
Complaint. Before Judge Pendleton. Pulton superior court. October 14, 1910.
1Opinion of the CourtEvans, P. J.
Poliak Brothers sold to the Niall-Herin Company, a corporation, a certain quantity of matting, and the action is on account to recover the purchase-price. The defendant admitted the purchase of the goods at the price stated, and pleaded payment. The case was tried before the judge without a jury, upon an agreed statement of facts, which may be condensed as follows: The plaintiffs drew a draft on the defendant for the purchase-price of the matting, payable, six months after sight, to the order of the *24Hongkong & Shanghai Banking Corporation. The draft was duly accepted by the defendant on June…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- The People v. . Merchants and Mechanics' Bk.New York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Nineteenth Ward Bank v. First National BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
- Anheuser-Busch Brewing Ass'n v. ClaytonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1893
- British & American Mortgage Co. v. TibballsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1884
- Scott v. GilkeyIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- King Hardware Co. v. EnnisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
- Columbia Grocery Co. v. MarshallTennessee Supreme Court · 1914
- Friends in Need Society v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
- United States National Bank v. GlantonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1917
- Wagner v. SpaethWyoming Supreme Court · 1927
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.