Nathan v. McGinley
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Chief Justice Schaffer,
Appealing from a judgment against him in an action for damages for personal injuries, which, plaintiff .received while riding as a guest in his automobile, driven by him, defendant seeks a new trial at our hands, as he did in the court below. t ,
He argues that the trial judge committed basic and fundamental error, in failing, to charge as to the burden of proof, and the weight and preponderance of the evidence; in failing to define negligence and contributory negligence, and to state and define the degrees of care required in a host and guest case; ■ and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Thompson v. FoxSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Sears v. BirbeckSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Wallace v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
- Nathan v. McGinleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
3Cited by10 opinions
- Lebesco v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Knoble Et Ux. v. RitterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Commonwealth v. RobinsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Volterano v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Hurchick v. Falls Township Board of Supervisors, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County1963
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.