Commonwealth v. Robinson
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Ehodes, J.,
Defendant was convicted as an accessory before and after the fact to burglary. His motion for a new trial having been refused and sentence imposed, this appeal was taken.
The assignments of error are directed to alleged errors in the charge of the court and to the admission of evidence.
The questions raised do not require a detailed review of the voluminous record, as the sufficiency of the evidence to support the conviction is not questioned by appellant. The Commonwealth proved that on March 31, 1941, the building of the Clearfield Taxidermy Company, in Clearfield, Pa.,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BrunoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Commonwealth v. ElliottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- Commonwealth v. BrownSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
- Commonwealth v. KaySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
- Lyke v. Lehigh Valley RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BartellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Commonwealth v. SchusterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
- Commonwealth v. NeumanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Commonwealth v. MorrisonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
- Commonwealth v. BrownSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.