Legal Opinion

Nathan v. McGinley

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 30, 1940No. Appeal, 221PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Schaffer,

Was the service upon the additional defendant, a nonresident, valid? The court below held not. The original defendant, who endeavored to bring in the additional one, appeals.

A collision occurred in Montgomery County between the automobile of defendant and that of the additional defendant, who is a resident of the State of North Carolina. Plaintiff was riding in original defendant’s car. She brought suit against him in Philadelphia, where he resides. By petition under Pa. B. C. P. No. 2252, 332 Pa. exxiii, he seeks to bring in the additional defendant. The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Williams Et Ux. v. MeredithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  2. Gossard v. GossardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. McCall v. GatesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  2. Hartman v. DonahueSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  3. Nathan v. McGinleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  4. Brown v. HughesDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1955
  5. Burbank v. GrantDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1972

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API