Barnard v. McKenzie
Supreme Court of Colorado
Appeal from District Court of Lalce County. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtElbert, J.
This was a petition to enforce a mechanics’ lien on the Berry tunnel, under the provision of the lien law of 1872. ■ Sess. Laws, 1872, p. 147;
Section four of the act provides, that “ all miners, laborers and others who work or labor to the amount of twenty-five dollars or more, in or upon any mine, lode or deposit, yielding metals or minerals of any kind, or upon any shaft, tunnel, adit or other excavation designed or used for the purpose of draining or working any such mine, lode or deposit, and all persons who shall furnish any timber or other material to the amount of twenty-five dollars…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Knight v. NorrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1868
3Cited by25 opinions
- Cary Hardware Co. v. McCartyColorado Court of Appeals · 1897
- Thompson v. Wise Boy Mining & Milling Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1903
- Williams v. Uncompahgre Canal Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1889
- Fowler & Peth, Inc. v. ReganSupreme Court of Colorado · 2007
- Rico Reduction & Mining Co. v. MusgraveSupreme Court of Colorado · 1890
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.