Legal Opinion

Fowler & Peth, Inc. v. Regan

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 26, 2007No. 06SA286PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Martinez

We agreed to answer a certified question from the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals determining whether a claimant must have a properly perfected lien or still be able to file such a lien under the time limitations provid*1283ed by the Colorado mechanics’ lien statutes, sections 38-22-109 and 110, to seek access to moneys held in trust under section 38-22-127 of the Colorado Revised Statutes. We hold that the procedural requirements for perfecting a lien contained in sections 38-22-109 and 110 do not apply to claims against money held in trust under section 38-22-127.

The General Mechanics’ Lien laws1…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Charnes v. BoomSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  2. People v. CrossSupreme Court of Colorado · 2006
  3. Discount Home Center, Inc. v. Turner (In Re Turner)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1991
  4. Denver Publishing Co. v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
  5. Zab, Inc. v. Berenergy Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2006

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Fowler & Peth, Inc. v. Regan (In Re Regan)Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
  2. Syfrett v. PullenColorado Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. People v. AdamsSupreme Court of Colorado · 2010
  4. Bemas Construction, Inc. v. Dorland (In Re Dorland)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 2007
  5. MORRIS-SCHINDLER, LLC. v. City & County of DenverColorado Court of Appeals · 2010

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API