Legal Opinion

Williams v. Uncompahgre Canal Co.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 15, 1889PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court of Denver.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr: Justice Elliott

delivered the opinion of the court.. From the record in this case it appears that the Uncompahgre Canal Company, one of the appellees herein, spoken of in this opinion as “ The Canal Company,” was organized as a corporation under the laws of this state in May, 1883, for the purpose of constructing an irrigating canal in Montrose county, Colorado.

In September, 1883, Theodore C. Henry, being the president, and Henry J. Aldrich, the treasurer, of said canal company, entered into a contract with Joseph Williams, one of the appellants herein, whereby Williams agreed to construct…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Briggs v. . PartridgeNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  2. Ford v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1858
  3. Randall v. Van VechtenNew York Supreme Court · 1821
  4. Barnard v. McKenzieSupreme Court of Colorado · 1878
  5. San Juan & St. Louis Mining & Smelting Co. v. FinchSupreme Court of Colorado · 1882

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Cary Hardware Co. v. McCartyColorado Court of Appeals · 1897
  2. Federal Lumber Co. v. WheelerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
  3. City of Delta v. ThompsonColorado Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Rice v. BushSupreme Court of Colorado · 1891
  5. Fowler & Peth, Inc. v. ReganSupreme Court of Colorado · 2007

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API