Legal Opinion
Singh v. Uber Technologies Inc.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided January 30, 2017No. Civ. Action No. 16-3044 (FLW)PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOLFSON, District Judge:
Plaintiff Jaswinder Singh (hereinafter, “Plaintiff’) filed this action against Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc. (hereinafter, “Defendant” or “Uber”), alleging that Defendant (i) misclassified him and other similarly situated New Jersey Uber drivers as independent contractors, rather than employees; (ii) failed to pay overtime compensation; and (iii) required drivers to pay for significant business expenses that were incurred for the benefit of Defendant. In the instant matter, Defendant moves to dismiss the complaint and compel arbitration, arguing that…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Green Tree Financial Corp.-Alabama v. RandolphSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Kai Peng v. Uber Technologies, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2017
- Saizhang Guan v. Uber Technologies, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2017
- Hite v. Lush Internet Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2017
- Rimel v. Uber Technologies, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2017
- BROWN v. CREDIT ONE BANKDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2024
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.