Legal Opinion

Scott v. Reinier

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 2, 1979No. 78-1032PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPattoN, J.

The single issue before this court is whether R. C. 124.34 provides an appointing authority the right to appeal an order of the State Personnel Board of Review, modifying an employee’s removal order to a suspension order, to the Court of Common Pleas.

*69R. C. Í24.34 (prior to its amendment effective March 13, 1978) read, in pertinent part, as follows:

“In any case of reduction, suspension of more than five working dags, or removal, the appointing authority shall furnish such employee with a copy of the order of reduction, suspension, or removal, which order shall state the reasons therefor. Such…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Anderson v. MinterOhio Supreme Court · 1972
  2. State ex rel. Osborn v. JacksonOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  3. State ex rel. Stough v. Bd. of Edn. of the Norton City School Dist.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977
  4. State ex rel. Bingham v. RileyOhio Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Diebler v. DentonOhio Court of Appeals · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Davis v. State Personnel Bd. of ReviewOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Maiden v. Fayette County Board of Retardation & Development DisabilitiesOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Fraternal Order of Police v. City of Maple HeightsOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Davis v. State Personnel Board of ReviewOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Stokes v. SneedOhio Court of Appeals · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API