State ex rel. Bingham v. Riley
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
The petition states unequivocally that the decision of the State Personnel Board of Review directed the respondent to restore the relators to their positions retroactive to the date of termination; that respondent has failed to comply with that decision; and that the respondent did not appeal from the judgment of the Court of Common Pleas dismissing the appeal from the board. There being no timely appeal from the decision of the board or from the judgment of the Court of Common Pleas, the matter is res judicata. Neither the decision of the board nor the judgment of the court is subject to…
2Cited by18 opinions
- State ex rel. Ogan v. TeaterOhio Supreme Court · 1978
- State ex rel. Stough v. Bd. of Edn. of the Norton City School Dist.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977
- Nayman v. KilbaneOhio Supreme Court · 1982
- State ex rel. Rose v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & CorrectionOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- Wade v. City of ClevelandOhio Court of Appeals · 1982
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.