Legal Opinion

Fraternal Order of Police v. City of Maple Heights

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 15, 1991No. 59158PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nahra, Presiding Judge.

Fraternal Order of Police, Lodge No. 67 (“F.O.P.”) appeals from the trial court’s decision which declared that the police promotional examination administered by the Maple Heights Civil Service Commission was in conformity with state law and qualified as a competitive examination, and that Maple Heights, as a charter municipality, was entitled to delegate the formulation of the examination to the civil service commission. For the reasons set forth below, we reverse.

F.O.P. and two Maple Heights police officers originally brought suit against Maple Heights, its mayor and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Northern Ohio Patrolmen's Benevolent Ass'n v. City of ParmaOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State ex rel. Bardo v. City of LyndhurstOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Ohio Ass'n of Public School Employees v. City of TwinsburgOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State ex rel. Habe v. City of South EuclidOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  5. State ex rel. East Cleveland Ass'n of Firefighters, Local 500 v. City of East ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McArdle v. RodriguezAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
  2. State ex rel. Hipp v. City of North CantonOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State ex rel. Hipp v. N. CantonOhio Supreme Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API