Legal Opinion

Corbitt v. Timmerman

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1893PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from Kent. (Montgomery, J.) Bill in aid of execution. Defendants appeal. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.

Complainant obtained a judgment in the circuit court for the county of Kent against the defendant Leonard Timmerman and William W. Taylor, and execution was duly issued tliereon. The sheriff called upon Mr. Timmerman August 6, and requested payment. Mr. Timmerman promised to call upon the officer a few days after. Instead, however, of keeping his promise, he caused to be recorded, August 8, a deed from himself to his wife of the premises in question, which constituted the only property Timmerman had upon which a levy could be made. A levy was made, and complainant filed a bill in chancery to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ferguson v. . CrawfordNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  2. Arnold v. NyeMichigan Supreme Court · 1871

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Park v. Employment Security CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Hewett Grocery Co. v. Biddle Purchasing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Dunlap v. ByersMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Kaufmann v. DrexelNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Miller v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1897

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API