Legal Opinion

Miller v. Smith

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1897PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Error to Kent; Adsit, J. Replevin by Nelson F. Miller against William H. Smith. From a judgment for plaintiff on verdict directed by the court, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

The plaintiff resides on the county line between Kent and Ottawa counties, in Ottawa county. September 21, 1896, an Ohio corporation brought suit against him before a justice of the peace living in Grand Rapids, Kent county. The summons was served in Kent county, and regularly returned. No attention was paid to the summons by the defendant in the case before the justice.- Judgment was rendered against him. An execution was issued, and delivered to the defendant in this case, who was a deputy sheriff. The officer levied upon a quantity of potatoes. The plaintiff in this case replevined them,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ferguson v. . CrawfordNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  2. Wall v. TrumbullMichigan Supreme Court · 1867
  3. Hume v. ConduittIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Fulkerson v. DavenportSupreme Court of Missouri · 1879
  5. Corbitt v. TimmermanMichigan Supreme Court · 1893

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Garey v. Morley BrothersMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Edwards v. MeinbergMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Clabaugh v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Hoben v. Citizens' Telephone Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Rohrabacher v. WalshMichigan Supreme Court · 1912

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API