Legal Opinion

Kaufmann v. Drexel

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided October 5, 1898No. 8249PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from the district court of Douglas county. Heard below before Keysor, J.

1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.

Tu May, 1893, a dwelling-house standing in one of the public streets of the city of South Omaha was seized by the defendant Adams, a constable of Douglas county, under an execution issued on a judgment for work and *230labor rendered against one Oarl Hanuse. The building was owned by Hanuse and, with the view of recovering its possession, he consulted Theodore F. Elliott, a member of tiie Douglas county bar. Owing to the fact that Hanuse had an imperfect knowledge of the English language and that Elliott did not understand German-for which, however, the plaintiff herein was not in the slightest…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Shelton v. TiffinSupreme Court of the United States · 1848
  2. Chambers Bros. & Co. v. King Wrought-Iron Bridge ManufactorySupreme Court of Kansas · 1876
  3. Bankers Life Insurance v. RobbinsNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Putnam v. LangleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1882
  5. Winters v. MeansNebraska Supreme Court · 1888

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Welch v. WelchNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Fehrman v. Town of Pine RiverWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Hassett v. BuchfinckNebraska Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Carpenter v. Iowa State Traveling Men's Ass'nSupreme Court of Iowa · 1932
  5. Ehlers v. GroveNebraska Supreme Court · 1946

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API