People v. Price
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment pronounced on defendant after his conviction of the crime of grand theft.
Defendant argues as his sole ground for reversal of the judgment that the information filed against him does not state facts sufficient to constitute a public offense. He did not question the sufficiency of the information in the trial court.
The charging part of the information is as follows:
“Earby Price is accused by the District Attorney of the County of San Diego, State of California, by this information of the crime of grand theft from the person committed as follows : The said Earby…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- People v. EdwardsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- People v. AmmermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- People v. SingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- People v. CovingtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- People v. DozierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- People v. CodinaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- People v. BattilanaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- People v. MasonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- People v. GannCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Krause v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1991
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.