Legal Opinion

People v. Dozier

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 3, 1939No. Crim. 523PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRIFFIN, J. —

Appellant and his codefendant, Carl Fisher, were charged in an information filed by the district attorney of Kern County with the crime of robbery. Defendants were found guilty by a jury of the crime of robbery, which was fixed as robbery in the second degree. Appellant admitted the two prior convictions, and his motions in arrest of judgment and for new trial were denied. Appellant Dozier alone appeals from the judgment of conviction and from the order denying him a new trial.

Charles J ones, the victim of the robbery, a young man from the Arvin District, drove into Bakersfield…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. People v. AmmermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. People v. SampsellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  3. People v. RosenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  4. People v. NelsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  5. People v. ViceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. People v. AdamsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. People v. ColemanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  3. Thomas v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1964
  4. People v. ShawCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  5. People v. WadeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API