Legal Opinion

People v. Battilana

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 11, 1942No. Crim. 1784PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

The defendant was convicted on four counts of an indictment for the crimes of (1) rape committed by means of force and violence, (2) rape committed by means of threats of bodily harm, (3) fellatio committed contrary to the provisions of section 288a of the Penal Code, and (4) the infamous crime against nature prohibited by section 286 of the Penal Code. Motions in arrest of judgment and for a new trial were denied. An appeal was taken from the judgment and from orders denying a motion in arrest of judgment and a new trial.

For grounds of reversal it is contended the testimony of the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. People v. PantagesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  2. People v. ShawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  4. People v. Dong Pok YipCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  5. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. People v. BowleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  2. People v. HurlburtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  3. People v. OtisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  4. People v. GoldsteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  5. People v. WalkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API