Legal Opinion

Troescher v. Grody

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 24, 2005PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

LALLY-GREEN, J.:

¶ 1 Appellant health care providers appeal from the order dated January 8, 2004, requiring them to turn over certain documents in discovery. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for further proceedings.

¶ 2 This is a medical malpractice action brought by plaintiffs/appellees Elizabeth Troescher and her husband, Jude Muoio. 1 Troescher claimed that Appellant Dr. Marvin Grody performed a negligent surgery on Troescher and failed to obtain her informed consent. Troescher also alleged corporate negligence on the part of Appellants Temple University Hospital,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Thompson v. Nason HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. Ben v. SchwartzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. Zane v. Friends HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  4. J.S. v. WhetzelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  5. Jacksonian v. Temple University Health System FoundationSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Reginelli v. Marcellus Boggs, M.D., Monongahela Valley Hosp., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  2. Dodson v. DeleoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Dennis L. Cawthorn v. Catholic Health Initiatives Iowa Corp. D/B/A Mercy Hospital Medical Center, a CorporationSupreme Court of Iowa · 2011
  4. Piroli v. LodicoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  5. Venosh v. Henzes, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County2013

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API