Legal Opinion

Piroli v. Lodico

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 12, 2006No. Nos. 1695 WDA 2005, 1771 WDA 2005PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

BENDER, J.:

¶ 1 Three Rivers Endoscopy Center (“TRE”) appeals from the September 20, 2005 order dismissing its objection to a subpoena that was served upon it during discovery by the plaintiff, David Piroli, administrator of the estate of Cathy Piroli, in an underlying wrongful death and survival action. TRE objected to the subpoena, claiming that certain materials related to its review of the incident underlying the wrongful death and survival case constituted peer review materials that were protected from discovery under the Peer Review Protection Act (“PRPA”), 63 P.S. §§…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McManamon v. WashkoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. McClellan v. Health Maintenace OrganizationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  3. Dodson v. DeleoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  4. Young v. Western Pennsylvania HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  5. McClellan v. Health Maintenance OrganizationSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Yocabet v. UPMC PresbyterianSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  2. Reginelli v. Marcellus Boggs, M.D., Monongahela Valley Hosp., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  3. Venosh v. Henzes, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County2013
  4. Ingros v. BFG Electroplating & Manufacturing Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Jefferson County2006
  5. Venosh, A.M. v. Jack Henzes, MDSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API